Tag Archive | "Samantha"

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

More Girls, Little Ones, Try to Take Back the Multiplex

Posted on 10 June 2008 by JoyCeleb

“Kit Kittredge: An American Girl” has no sex and not much of a city.

But this G-rated movie adventure is shaping up as Hollywood’s next serious bid for female viewers, some of whom showed their power by pushing the R-rated comedy “Sex and the City” to surprisingly strong first-weekend ticket sales of more than $57 million two weeks ago.

At first glance, the films have little in common, apart from their skew toward the female.

“Sex” runs hot, while “Kit” — scheduled for wide release on July 2, the same day as “Hancock,” starring Will Smith — does not. Fans of the fictional Manhattan writer Carrie Bradshaw, the heroine of “Sex and the City,” are often over 40. Ms. Kittredge, an aspiring reporter based on Mattel’s incredibly popular American Girl doll of the same name, mostly appeals to girls between 7 and 12.

Yet the films have a certain kinship. Each was made by a studio — “Kit” by Picturehouse, “Sex” by New Line Cinema — that was only weeks ago marked for elimination by the same corporate parent, Time Warner Inc.

And “Kit” has a shot at attracting an intense niche audience of the sort that boosted “Sex” at a time of year that has become better known for fantasies like the “Spider-Man” and “Pirates of the Caribbean” movies, with their broad demographic appeal.

“I’m scared out of my mind,” said Elaine Goldsmith-Thomas, a producer of “Kit Kittredge,” speaking by telephone last week. She was referring to an unconventional decision by Picturehouse executives to open this relatively small film in around 1,800 theaters, putting it in competition with potential blockbusters like “Hancock,” from Sony Pictures, and “Wall-E,” from the Walt Disney Company’s Pixar Animation Studios.

“Kit,” which cost about $10 million to produce, stars Abigail Breslin (“Little Miss Sunshine”) and features an ensemble that mingles unknown child actors with adult pros like Julia Ormond, Stanley Tucci, Chris O’Donnell and Joan Cusack. Set in 1934, it tells the story of a Cincinnati girl who is trying to get the local newspaper to take her seriously as a reporter, even as her family and just about everyone else struggles with the Great Depression.

(Julia Roberts, a client of Ms. Goldsmith-Thomas when she was a talent agent, is an executive producer of “Kit.” The two were among those with producing credits on earlier television movies based on three other American Girls: Molly, Felicity and Samantha.)

That quite so innocent an enterprise should be in a position to challenge much racier movies with much higher budgets has much to do with the promotional power of American Girl, which, like HBO’s long-running “Sex and the City” series, is helping to prime loyal fans for a first film based on the brand.

In the toy world, American Girl’s characters — “they never refer to them as ‘dolls,’ ” Bob Berney, the president of Picturehouse, said in an interview last week — are unusual in that they come with detailed story lines, from various eras, delivered in books that accompany each figure.

Kit Kittredge, spunky and a bit confused by the economic crunch around her, has been the central character in a half-dozen titles that have contributed to the sale of some 120 million books since the company was founded in 1986, said Ellen Brothers, American Girl’s president and a producer of the film.

“We approve all the marketing,” Ms. Brothers said, describing her company’s close involvement with the making and selling of the movie. And American Girl has been using its considerable reach to promote what it is calling “Kit’s Big-Screen Debut.”

The company’s mail-order catalog, a primary engine for sales, has a blurb promoting the movie on its May cover. Cities with American Girl retail outlets — New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Dallas and suburban Atlanta — will get to see the movie early, beginning on June 20. That first round is being helped along on the Web with Kit’s movie blog and, at the Grove shopping mall in Los Angeles, with the giveaway of “Kit’s Home on Abbott Place,” an elaborate playhouse built by Pardee Homes as part of a benefit for the homeless.

Last Saturday mothers and daughters trooped through the siding- and stone-veneered structure to admire it, and to donate $5 for “opportunity tickets” — never say “raffle” — that buy a shot at taking it home. “ ‘Win Me?’ ” one mother gasped, reading a sign outside, “Oh, my God!”

Other plans include movie-night dinners at the in-store American Girl cafes, which begin to sound, at least a little, like the viewing parties that pushed “Sex and the City” over the top during its May 30 opening weekend.

Allie Mayer, a publicist for movietickets.com, said the service had seen “steady activity” since it began selling tickets for the early engagement last month.

Mr. Berney said a box-office success would be “a little bittersweet”: His company will remain intact only long enough to release its existing films, including “Kit,” “Mongol” and “The Women” (scheduled for fall). To date, the studio’s biggest box-office hit has been “Pan’s Labyrinth,” which took in $37.6 million at the domestic box office in 2006.

If “Kit” works, its success would owe something not just to the promotions, but also to the straight-shooting approach of a director, Patricia Rozema, whose earlier work includes “Mansfield Park” (1999) for Miramax.

“I don’t think you talk down to children when you make a movie for them,” Ms. Rozema said. She spoke in a telephone interview about Kit’s rather intricate on-screen problem, which include doubts about a father, played by Mr. O’Donnell, who leaves home in search of work, and no small difficulties with a newspaper editor played by Wallace Shawn.

Still, Kit preserves her G-rated innocence, something Ms. Rozema said had become too rare, even in films aimed at the young. (“Bratz: The Movie,” which was based on a doll line and took in about $10 million for Lionsgate last summer, was rated PG.)

“They don’t need to be rattled,” she said. “They’re rattled enough.”

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Kim Cattrall puts sex on the menu at food awards

Posted on 09 June 2008 by JoyCeleb

Is there anything sexier than food?

It’s probably no surprise that for Kim Cattrall it’s the people who make it.

Known for her vixen character, Samantha, in “Sex and the City,” Cattrall put sex talk on the menu while hosting Sunday’s James Beard Foundation awards, often called the “Oscars” of the food world.

Cattrall opened the ceremony talking about her own love of cooking, then asked co-host and celebrity chef Bobby Flay what has more sex appeal than food. A breath later, she offered her own answer.

“Maybe what’s sexier is the chefs who are always cooking up something new and exciting,” she cooed.

Cattrall then quickly challenged Flay to a “throwdown” in the kitchen, to which Flay said: “Don’t worry. I’ll be gentle.”

“Sex and the City” grossed $21.3 million this weekend, earning $99.3 million total after only 10 days in theaters. The movie is based on the HBO television series.

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,

“Sex and the City” popularity cuts across ages and gender

Posted on 05 June 2008 by JoyCeleb

It wasn’t just the shoes.

No, it was - and still is - the empowerment, the frank talk, the lingo and the fantasy of being that rich, single and well-dressed in that city which made HBO’s “Sex and the City” - now a movie that opens Friday - such a zeitgeist force for six water-cooler-boiling seasons. (Related: Kim Cattrall lets the cougar loose; Interactive movie preview)

Or maybe the appeal of “SATC,” which first aired in June 1998, all just came down to it being a well-written and stylishly acted paean to friendship and girl bonding. Carrie, Samantha, Miranda and Charlotte brunched and dissed; women of all ages and ethnicities tuned in.

Girls, too. The BFF-factor is what drew in “Hannah Montana’s” Miley Cyrus, right? Last month, the 15-year-old Disney queen raised eyebrows - and a few wagging fingers - when she proclaimed in the now infamous Vanity Fair piece that “SATC” was her fave show, and that “Hannah Montana” was in some ways patterned after the racy dramedy.

Cyrus later backpedaled, declaring she had only actually watched “SATC” in its edited version on TBS.

On the other hand, say fellow admirers of the show, what does a Miley Cyrus or any mature teen have to apologize for if she confesses to being an SATC-aholic? The show may have originally targeted thirtysomethings, but more than a few mother and daughters have broken out the popcorn over a TBS rerun or a DVD boxed set.

“It’s a good show for opening up dialogue that might not have been said otherwise,” says Melissa Havard, a Beverly Hills-based communications strategist. “It’s an opportunity to talk about a lot of mother/daughter things as a springboard to other issues.”

Havard and her daughter Katie - who write the mother-daughter advice column Ask the Teen Team on lovetoknow.com - shared the adventures of Carrie et al on a regular basis. Primarily via the TBS version.

Katie, 18, says her mom is the bigger fan, but that she doesn’t need her arm twisted to take a seat on the couch.

“It’s more of a girl-bonding thing,” she says. “My dad’s a pilot, and when he’s away, my mom and I go and watch `Sex and the City’ and giggle. It’s really good writing, and it’s fun to watch the pretty clothes. I love Samantha. I think she’s hilarious.

“I would definitely say the show is escapist,” Katie Havard adds, “a guilty pleasure.”

The Havards’ guilty pleasure “SATC” adventures are hardly unique. With its quartet of well-dressed but somewhat shallow heroines, the show became a viewing party touchstone that crossed racial and age boundaries.

“It’s a fascinating study and also a real pioneer in terms of women’s stories having a very magnetic component for the audience,” says Susan Shapiro Barash, author of “Little White Lies and Deep Dark Secrets: The Truth About Why Women Lie.” “The storylines seem specific to women in their late 30s going into their 40s, but it also resonates with what we aspire to at any age in America.”

Teens included?

“I’ve taught college for so many years and so many of our freshmen and sophomores seem devoted to it,” returns Barash, who teaches in special programs at Sarah Lawrence College. “Why not their younger sisters?”

Why not, indeed? TBS estimates that 29,000 girls age 12 to 17, are regular watchers of the reruns (about 3 percent of the total audience) while 154,000 (2.4 percent) watched the show during its final season on HBO.

Those may not seem like huge numbers, but a younger audience interest is starting to percolate.

The film’s MySpace page is creeping up to 30,000 friends, and episodes are now available on iTunes. Sarah Jessica Parker’s new Bitten clothing line skews young and is anything but Carrie Bradshaw pricey. And in a summer that figures to be dominated by the likes of Indy, Batman, the Hulk, a female-geared film - R-rating and all - figures to get the girls.

Anastasia Goodstein, founder of the Generation Y Web site Ypulse, said she was originally surprised when a 16-year-old she interviewed said - a la Miley - that “SATC” was her favorite show.

Upon further reflection, Goodstein says the younger audience interest makes sense. A program like “SATC” takes the place of teen magazines, a ‘tweener Cosmopolitan if you will.

“They’re particularly interested in hearing people talk about sex,” says Goodstein, author of “Totally Wired: What teens and Tweens are Really Doing Online.” “The reality is kids are in the process of becoming adolescents and awakening sexually. They’re all about sex, and nobody really talks to them about it.”

“I’m not saying `Sex in the City’ is where teenagers should be getting that information,” she adds, “but that’s why the show appeals to them.”

Laying aside the naughty content, girls can get into that “which type are you” quizzing: puritanical idealist Charlotte (Kristin Davis), hard-driving workaholic Miranda (Cynthia Nixon), fashion-obsessed Carrie or vixeny Samantha (Kim Cattrall). You don’t need to be of voting age, critics note, to have a circle of friends or to agonize whether someone is “just not that into you.”

Linda Kim was 25 when she first caught the show and became a “reluctant fan.” She had been told that her circle of friends had echoes of the “SATC” girls, but Kim hadn’t seen the show and didn’t understand the reference.

Then the self-professed former TV snob tuned in at the house of a former boyfriend who had HBO. And then she tuned in again.

“From that point on, I started talking to other people who, like myself, were not white, were not rich and some who weren’t heterosexual - all of whom found elements that were really appealing and relatable,” says Kim. “I thought this was really interesting.”

A sociology graduate student at UC Riverside, Kim’s doctoral dissertation will give a political, economic and feminist analysis of “Sex and the City.” She also references the series in a sexual behaviors class she teaches at Cal State, Long Beach. Carrie’s angst over dating a younger bisexual man became the topic of a classroom discussion.

Her students, Kim adds, are largely in their early 20s and don’t particularly care that the characters are a decade or more older with life priorities to match.

“They never bring up age as a factor,” says Kim. “I think it’s something critics or the media brings up: “Oh, these characters are too old and not relatable.”

For all the plaudits heaped on “SATC” for its depiction of powerful, independent women who march - in their Jimmy Choos - to their own beat, an equally valid argument could be made that the show is anything but feminist, says Robert Thompson, director of the Center for the Study of Popular Television at Syracuse University.

“The show can give you ideas on how to dress and how to walk,” says Thompson. “You could argue that this is essentially all about four women showing us how we can decorate the female body for the gaze of potential male partners. `Sex and the City’ looked like the catalog of a really fancy designer store, and it knew it.”

Comments (1)

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Lindsay Lohan & Samantha Ronson Go Public?

Posted on 24 May 2008 by JoyCeleb

Lindsay Lohan & Samantha Ronson Go Public?

Lindsay Lohan has been snapped in an amorous embrace with Samantha Ronson, further fuelling rumours that the two are lesbian lovers.

The gal pals were partying on P Diddy’s yacht in Cannes when they lost all their inhibitions and began acting like a couple, with firecrotch openly nuzzling the DJ’s neck.

An eyewitness told The Sun: “They looked like proper lovebirds. And they didn’t care who saw them draped over each other.

“If they are together then it’s a nice vision of their love.”

It’s a good job Ashley Olsen wasn’t there.

Last week, Lindsay’s mother Dina and younger sister Ali denied that she was partial to lady lumps

Comments (0)

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Samantha Speno-Orton Speaks Out

Posted on 17 May 2008 by JoyCeleb

Samantha Speno-Orton Speaks Out

Samantha Speno-Orton is the girl that took down professional WWE wrestler Randy Orton. That’s right, Samantha took Orton down the aisle and made him submit… to marriage! And she is staking her claim. Here is what Miss Speno-Orton had on her website:

i am the girl-friend of wwe Wrestler Randy Orton!
We meet at a bar!
He is a really sweet man!love him to bits
he popped the q in november of 2005!=]
we are set 4 the big day in the fall of 2007!
i am a dance teacher….i am always up for a party!=]
my best meomry with randy is when we laugh together!

i am here to talk to anyone….just leave a comment!

i will not give out anything personal about me and randys relationship
also if i get hate comments i will just block u..it’s the way it is!

oh incase i forget…DONT ASK FOR RANDYS CELL PHONE NUMBER ASI WONT GIVE IT 2 U!

Comments (0)